RESEARCH >> Survey of Smoking in the Workplace
In
2000, the Department of Public Health sent 100 questionnaires to randomly
selected businesses in Gibraltar and another 80 questionnaires to randomly
selected Government departments, primarily to investigate whether a Smoking
Policy was in use on the premises, what its provisions were, what the employees'
exposure to passive smoking was and whether lack of information was a hurdle
to a Smoking Policy. The response rate to the survey was 62% (commercial),
60% (government) and 61% (overall), which is acceptable in surveys of this
sort, yielding a sample of between 8% and 20% of all workplace premises.
It was found that over 60%
of all organisations in the sample had a Smoking Policy and there was little difference
whether the organisation was commercial or governmental. The formality of the
policy was however quite low, as only 31% of the policies were written, the rest
being either verbal though compulsory (30%) or entirely voluntary (36%). As most
surveys of this kind define Smoking Policies as written and enforced, the prevalence
of true Smoking Policies in Gibraltar would be around 1 in 5 (19%) of all workplaces.
It was learnt that establishments that had Smoking Policies generally enforced
them - about 49% said that smoking was not permitted anywhere on the premises.
However, another 36% provided a dedicated smoking area. About 7% were frustrated
by the fact that some people ignored the policy and smoked where they liked. Just
over a third (36%) welcomed more information about smoking prevention.
The position with establishments
that did not have Smoking Policies was quite different. By far the majority (73%)
operated an environment where there was no dedicated area for smokers and in which
people could smoke where they liked. When asked why they did not have a Smoking
Policy, about 28% cited staff preference, but surprisingly, only 5% said that
they did it because their customers wanted it - the popular belief that establishments
avoid Smoking Policies so as not to turn away customers is not that true. However,
by far the largest proportion (60%) simply said that they had never thought about
it. A small number (8%) cited combinations of the above reasons.
On the question of dedicated smoking areas, 19% of establishments have designated
smoking areas and more than three-quarters of establishments operating such areas
prohibit smoking anywhere else.
The organisations in the samples ranged from those with fewer than five employees
to those who had over 150. Interestingly, there was no significant difference
between large or small organisations whether they had a Smoking Policy. However,
large organisations can clearly impact on the health of their employees more than
small ones and the table below shows the environments in which employees work.
| Number of Personnel | |||||
| Description of Workplace | Comm | Govt | Total | Risk of Passive Smoking | |
| Not stated | 57 | 53 | 110 | Not known | 4% |
| Smoking is NOT permitted anywhere on our premises | 281 | 278 | 559 | NO RISK | 21% |
| Smoking is permitted in individual ROOMS, but NOT permitted elsewhere | 278 | 213 | 491 | MODERATE RISK | 42% |
| There is a Smoking Area, but smoking is NOT permitted anywhere | 217 | 156 | 373 | ||
| There is a Smoking Area, but smoking is also permitted in individual rooms | 154 | 119 | 273 | ||
| There is a Smoking Area, but people also smoke anywhere they like | 22 | 22 | HIGH RISK | 33% | |
| We don't have a Smoking Area, and people smoke anywhere they like | 219 | 639 | 858 | ||
| Grand Total | 1206 | 1480 | 2686 | 100% | 100% |
From the table,
it is seen that only 21% of all employees can confidently face a working environment
in which the employer has taken measures to eliminate the risk of passive smoking.
This falls to 19% where government establishments are concerned.
At the other end, 33% of all employees are working in conditions that put them
at High Risk of Passive Smoking and this rises to a deeply worrying 45% when government
establishments are separately considered.
The following
conclusions and recommendations may be drawn from the survey :
- About 60% of Gibraltar's
organisations have Smoking Policies, but this is not enough.
- Permissive smoking practices
have developed largely to suit some employees or managers who smoke, not the customers.
- More than a third of Gibraltar's
employees work in conditions that expose them to passive smoking
- Government needs to give serious thought to establishing Smoking Policies at all its premises
